Legal Opinion

Suisman v. Eaton

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 18, 1935No. 3597PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, District Judge.

This is an action to recover income taxes heretofore paid. A jury having been waived, the case was tried to the court.

Facts.

1. The plaintiff, Sarah P. Suisman, of West Hartford, Conn., is the widow and residuary legatee under the will of Michael Suisman, late of Hartford, Conn., deceased, who died testate on April 4, 1921, leaving four children surviving him besides the plaintiff herein.

2. By his will, said decedent provided for the payment of his debts and funeral expenses, made certain charitable bequests, and bequeathed and devised his -entire estate remaining after…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bialock v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  2. Kenan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. BrinckerhoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  4. Howard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  5. Bialock v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API