Legal Opinion

Hiestand v. Kuns

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1847PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the Carroll Probate Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

This was a bill in chancery in the Carroll Probate Court, brought by a guardian, Jacob Kuns, praying a decree, confirming a settlement alleged to have been made with his deceased ward, Rosanna Hiestand, and releasing him from further liability on account of her estate. The bill was against the administrator and heirs of the ward. The cause was submitted to the Court on bill, answers, and depositions, and a final decree rendered for the. plaintiff. The case is as follows:. In 1827, the above-named Rosanna Hiestand, then about nine years of age, was living with the plaintiff, Jacob Kuns, her…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Lessee of HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Calloway v. DoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1825

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dequindre v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Carlile v. National Oil & Development Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. State Election Board v. BayhIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hayward v. HaywardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Warren v. HoferIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API