Legal Opinion

Rise v. Park

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 1946No. 34,222PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magnet, Justice.

Plaintiff, Mathilde E. Rise, brought action against Herbert T. Park to recover possession of certain personal property consisting of a note, judgments, and bonds,, and also to recover an alleged indebtedness as money had and received. Park, as executor of the estate of Katherine H. Tuelle, deceased, intervened, and the county of Hennepin was brought in as an additional defendant. The appeal is from the judgment entered upon dismissal of the action.

Claribel Smith and Katherine H. Tuelle were stepsisters. Plaintiff was a friend of Claribel Smith. On April 18, 1910, Claribel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beliveau v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. H. E. Westerman Lumber Co. v. RaschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Hershey v. Meeker County BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Larson v. MardausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of Hamilton H. Peyton, Deceased, John L. Peyton, and Olive Peyton v. Commissioner or Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  2. In Re Estate of BradleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Slocum v. SpaethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Estate of Peyton v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API