Legal Opinion

Barredo v. Skyfreight, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 19, 1983No. 82-609PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, Judge.

The courts are generally vested with considerable discretion in determining who shall pay the cost and expenses of receiverships. Deauville Corporation v. Blount, 160 Fla. 286, 34 So.2d 537 (1948). But, where the court had previously determined that defendant’s reprehensible conduct created the necessity for the appointment of receiver, a finding clearly supported by the record, it constituted an abuse of that discretion to tax the receiver’s expenses against the plaintiff. Jackson v. H.M. Wade Mfg. Co., 105 Fla. 560, 142 So. 228 (1932) (expenses and allowance to receiver as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sinclair, Etc. & Zavertnik, PA v. BaucomSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Walton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  3. Archer v. RossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Jackson v. Wade Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Deauville Corporation v. BlountSupreme Court of Florida · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. JKM Servs., LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Palmer ex rel. O'neil v. HortonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Federal National Mortgage Assoc. v. Jkm ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. Ready State Bank v. MeiselmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API