Legal Opinion

Citizens' Bank v. Shaw

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided October 12, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRIEBER, District Judge.

This is an action at law by plaintiff on a negotiable promissory note executed by the defendants to the Trinity Drilling Company, a corporation existing under the laws of the state of Texas, from whom the plaintiff, it is alleged, purchased it in good faith, for value, before maturity, and is now the holder thereof in due course; that on maturity payment was demanded, but not paid, nor any part thereof.

Defendants, in their answer, among other defenses, pleaded in paragraph 2:

“For further answer and defense these defendants allege that the said Trinity Drilling Company…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. David Lupton's Sons Co. v. Automobile Club of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Mahar v. . Harrington Park Villa SitesNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Hogan v. Intertype Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  5. Dean v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ockenfels v. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  2. Pacific National Bank v. HernreichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  3. Pacific National Bank v. HernreichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API