Legal Opinion

Moore v. Chrysler Corp.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 9, 1981No. 637Published

1Opinion of the CourtCouch, J.

*519The question involved in this appeal is whether appellants should have been allowed to intervene in an existing law suit in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. The trial judge had denied their motion to intervene on the ground that appellants’ interests were being adequately represented at that time.

The background facts may be briefly set forth. Chrysler Corporation filed a law suit against one of its dealers, L. P. Steuart Silver Spring, Inc. (L. P. Steuart), Imperial Investment Company (Imperial), alleged sole owner of L. P. Steuart, Harry Martens, Jr., president and chief executive…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Los Angeles Rams Football Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Citizens Coordinating Committee on Friendship Heights, Inc. v. TKU AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Ford Motor Company v. Bisanz Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  5. Shenk v. Maryland District Savings & Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API