Legal Opinion
Aycock v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 9, 1993No. B14-90-00638-CRPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
SEARS, Justice.
Appellant was charged with possession of a controlled substance, namely cocaine, weighing less than 28 grams. He presented the trial court with a motion to suppress all evidence seized as a result of two warrantless searches. The trial court denied the motion, and Appellant pled guilty. The Court deferred adjudication of guilt, placed the Appellant on seven years probation and assessed an eight hundred dollar fine.
Appellant appealed, claiming that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress because both searches violated his rights under the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. RamseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNairy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Crane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Tamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hallmark v. Hand, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
- Grant Thornton LLP v. Suntrust Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
- Aitch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Allen-Burch, Inc. v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- Justice Bail Bonds v. Samaniego, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.