Legal Opinion

Garbarino v. Lee C. Miller Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1951No. Docket 4, Calendar 44,882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff .brought this suit for an accounting. Some testimony was taken in open court bearing upon the issues presented by plaintiff’s amended bill of complaint and the answer thereto. On the third day. of the hearing, and before defendants had rested, the circuit judge made and caused to be entered the following order:

“This matter having come on to be heard, the court having taken testimony in open court ■ and being fully advised in the premises, •
“On motion of Stanley J. Domzalski, attorney for the plaintiff,
“It is ordered that the above entitled cause be referred to Arthur A. Sempliner,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Watson v. DaxMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Phelps v. Grand Rapids Growers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Aletha Maticka Trust v. Martin J WissmuellerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Aletha Maticka Trust v. Martin J WissmuellerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API