Legal Opinion

Indian River Recovery Co. v. China

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 3, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 85-315 CMWPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.

FACTS

In 1970, while conducting wire-dragging navigational obstruction surveys of the shipping lanes at the mouth of the Delaware Bay, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) vessels snagged an obstruction at 38°49'14" North latitude, 74°55'00" West longitude. This location is approximately eleven miles east of Cape Henlopen, Delaware and seven and one-half miles south of Cape May, New Jersey, in the federally-administered waters known as the contiguous zone.

The obstruction turned out to be the wreck of a heretofore undiscovered…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lawton Chiles, Jr., Bob Martinez, Metropolitan Dade County, Intervenors-Appellants v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
  3. King v. ChristieDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
  4. Indian River Recovery Co. v. the ChinaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1986
  5. UPS Worldwide Forwarding, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API