Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kane v. Dizney

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 21, 1997No. 96-3064Published

1DissentAntoon, Judge

I respectfully dissent. In my view, the facts in this ease do not justify a modification of custody under the best interest of the children standard. Section 61.13(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1995), provides the trial court with several options with regard to the imposition of sanctions on a parent who fails to honor the other parent’s visitation rights, the most drastic of which is a change in primary residence or custody of the children. However, this extreme sanction cannot be imposed unless the change in custody is also in the best interest of the children. Here, the mother failed to sustain…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API