Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Till

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 23, 1924No. 3 Div. 657PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The hill is to cancel a cloud on title to real estate.

The case made by the record is this: Fred Stockman, through whom both parties claim the lands, filed his petition in the circuit court, in equity, and obtained a decree removing his disabilities of nonage. Code 1907, § 4505 et seq. Three days thereafter he executed a conveyance of the lands to the respondent, Sophronia Hntchinson. About three months thereafter he filed his petition or bill in the same court, setting up that at the time of obtaining the decree removing his disabilities he had not arrived at the age of 18 years, that he had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scott v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Goodman v. WinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. Duncan v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  4. Cox v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. Ex parte PriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BaylissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Christopher v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  3. Davenport v. DavenportCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  4. Baril v. BarilSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  5. McGathey v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API