Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bowers v. Bowers

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 3, 2018No. SC 96545Published

1ConcurrenceZel M. Fischer, Chief Justice

I concur with result of the principal opinion but would hold Mrs. Bowers' first point relied on violates Rule 84.04(d) and preserves nothing for appellate review. The Rule 84.04 briefing rules are mandatory.

*618Storey v. State , 175 S.W.3d 116, 126 (Mo. banc 2005). Rule 84.04(d)(1) requires an appellant's brief to contain a "Point Relied On" identifying a claim of reversible error, concisely stating the legal reasons for that claim, and summarily explaining why the stated legal reasons support the claim of reversible error. "Rule 84.04(d) prohibits a point relied on that groups together multiple…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Richard E. Ivie, Jimmie R. Ivie, LaDonna Small, and Bernard Ivie v. Arnold L. Smith and Sidney B. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. Storey v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  4. In the Interest of: J.A.R., D.K.R., and A.E.R., Children Under Seventeen Years of Age, Greene County Juvenile Office v. D.G.R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. Joshua Peters, The Missouri Attorney General, Intervenor/Respondent v. Rachel M. JohnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API