Marlow v. State

(after stating the facts as above.) It is first contended that the trial court, erred in admitting over the objection of the defendant evidence of acts of sexual intercourse between the prosecuting witness and the defendant committed subsequent to the alleged acts relied upon for a conviction.

T-he state elected to rely upon an elleged act of sexual intercourse committed on the 5th day of April, 1918, and the prosecuting witness was permitted to testify that she and the defendant indulged in, under similar circumstances, frequent acts of intercourse at short intervals continuously from the…