Legal Opinion

Bell v. Scarbrough

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 29, 1942No. 29712PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

This case was previously before this court. Scarbrough v. Bell, 66 Ga. App. 320 (17 S. E. 2d, 919). We are not now concerned with the question there determined. The record presents two questions: First, did the court err in allowing the amendent? Second, did the court err in overruling the motion for new trial?

1. It will be noticed that the attack on the original affidavit was made at the return term. The amendment was offered and allowed over objection at the return term. We think, under the facts of this case and the broad provisions of Code § 81-1001, that the court did not err in refusing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Simmons Furniture & Lumber Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Armour Fertilizer Works v. DwightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. Richey v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Smith v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Wilkes v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of LaGrange v. USAA InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. McLendon v. LemonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API