Kaelin v. City of Louisville
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Chief Justice..
The sole issue we decide on this appeal is whether the. right of cross-examination is required by due process of law in a trial-type adjudicátory hearing before an administrative body. The Court of Appeals answered in the negative. We disagree, and reverse.
Respondent property owner, Bellarmine College, and respondent land developer, Highland Community Ministries, Inc. jointly applied to the Louisville and Jefferson County Planning Commission for a zone change. Following a public hearing, the Commission recommended that the existing zoning classification of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- American Beauty Homes Corp. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- City of Louisville v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
- Morris v. City of CatlettsburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Fiscal Court of Jefferson County v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc. v. County of BooneKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
- Donnelly Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia Historic Preservation Review BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ford Contracting, Inc. v. Kentucky Transportation CabinetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014
- Winslow v. Town of Holderness Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Minton v. Fiscal Court of Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.