Legal Opinion

Rarrick v. Browne

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1949No. 31509PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.

At common law, an innkeeper’s liability for loss of a guest’s property is analogous to that of a common carrier. He is an insurer of such property against all loss on his premises with the following exceptions:

1. Loss occasioned by act of Hod or of the public enemy.

2. Loss occasioned by negligence of the guest.

3. Loss occurring while the property is in the exclusive custody and control of the guest (for example, where not kept in the guest’s room or other proper place designated by the innkeeper for safekeeping of such property).

Thus, it is usually sufficient for the guest to prove that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Justus Gale's Administratrix v. Van Arman & HopkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1849

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. World Diamond, Inc. v. Hyatt Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Dunbar v. American Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Korr v. Thomas Emery's Sons, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Chase Rand Corp. v. Pick Hotels Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Rappaport v. Akron West Hilton InnOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API