Legal Opinion

Congressional Pay Amendment

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel

Decided May 13, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

Congressional Pay Amendment T h e C o n g ressio n al Pay A m endm ent, w hich w as originally proposed by C ongress to the States for ratification in 1789, and having been ratified by three-fourths o f the S tates, h as b een ratified p u rsu an t to A rticle V and is accordingly now part o f the C onstitution. U n d er 1 U .S .C . § 106b, the A rchivist was, upon receipt o f form al instrum ents o f ratification from the req u isite num ber o f States, required to publish the C ongressional Pay A m endm ent along w ith his certificate specifying that the A m endm ent has becom e valid, to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Mabel A. King v. James F. Palmer, Director, D.C. Department of Corrections Mabel A. King v. James F. Palmer, Director, D.C. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API