Congressional Pay Amendment
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel
1Opinion of the Court
Congressional Pay Amendment T h e C o n g ressio n al Pay A m endm ent, w hich w as originally proposed by C ongress to the States for ratification in 1789, and having been ratified by three-fourths o f the S tates, h as b een ratified p u rsu an t to A rticle V and is accordingly now part o f the C onstitution. U n d er 1 U .S .C . § 106b, the A rchivist was, upon receipt o f form al instrum ents o f ratification from the req u isite num ber o f States, required to publish the C ongressional Pay A m endm ent along w ith his certificate specifying that the A m endm ent has becom e valid, to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Mabel A. King v. James F. Palmer, Director, D.C. Department of Corrections Mabel A. King v. James F. Palmer, Director, D.C. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.