Legal Opinion

City of Port Arthur v. Tillman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 1, 1964No. 7577PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FANNING, Justice.

Plaintiff, City of Port Arthur, as successor and subrogated to the rights of Jefferson County Water Control and Improvement District No. 11, brought suit against defendants, Harrell G. Tillman and wife, D. D. Tillman, Mack Hannah, Jr., Hamilton Paul, Emily Bridges, Isaac Prejean, Frank Boutte, and American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, alleging to the effect that the defendants Hannah, Paul, Bridges, Prejean and Boutte as directors of Jeffer*139son County Water Control District No. 11 had violated and breached various of their statutory duties as trustees and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Quinn v. PressTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Ruebeck v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Wise v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Sherman v. SipperTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Hatcher v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1935

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Port Arthur v. TillmanTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Daves v. Lawyers Surety CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Brown v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Hemphill County v. RathjenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. City of Port Arthur v. TillmanTexas Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API