Legal Opinion

Kurtzon v. Sterling Industries, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1964No. Civ. A. 32450PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, District Judge.

The defendant has moved to dismiss this patent infringement action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) (7) for failure of the plaintiff to join as an indispensable party Alkco Manufacturing Company of Chicago. This close corporation is controlled by the plaintiff, Albert Kurtzon, who is its president and major stockholder.

This action was begun in December of 1962 by the plaintiff, an individual who is the sole owner of the patent. An amended complaint was later filed by the plaintiff to set forth patent 2,897,347 in lieu of patent 2,578,190.

Defendant, in its original answer, pleaded…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Western Electric Co. v. Pacent Reproducer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Caldwell Manufacturing Co. v. Unique Balance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aetna-Standard Engineering Co. v. RowlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Marley Co. v. FE Petro, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1998
  3. Trio Process Corp. v. L. Goldstein's Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API