Legal Opinion

Clegg v. Grasso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 29, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCasey, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Ryan, Jr., J.), entered February 20, 1991 in Schenectady County, which, inter alia, in an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15, granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and declared that plaintiffs had an easement over defendant’s property.

At issue on this appeal is whether the evidence in the record establishes, as a matter of law, that plaintiffs are *910entitled to an implied easement over defendant’s property. We agree with Supreme Court that the undisputed facts support an award of summary judgment to plaintiffs on the implied easement issue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fischer v. LiebmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. De Ruscio v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Firsty v. De ThomasisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Heim v. ConroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Palma v. MastroianniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. B.J. 96 Corp. v. MesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Iovine v. CaldwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Cashman v. ShutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API