Legal Opinion · Dissent

Coonley v. Lowden

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 8, 1944No. 46316Published

1DissentSmith, C. J.

(dissenting) — I dissent from Division I of the majority opinion. The record, as I read it, utterly fails to show any direct or circumstantial evidence of freedom from contributory negligence sufficient to carry that issue to the jury. The burden was on plaintiff to make such affirmative showing. He was aided by no presumption. Our province is not to determine-whether he was in fact negligent, but to say whether there is evidence to support a jury finding that he was noi negligent. (I will use the term plaintiff to refer to the driver of the ear whenever the context so indicates.)

It is well…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  2. Moore v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Wilson v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Beemer v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Bales v. BalesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API