Bazzel v. Pine Plaza Joint Venture
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff Pine Plaza Joint Venture (hereinafter "Pine Plaza") instituted this action to recover overdue rent on a building leased to defendant Jerry Frank Bazzel. The trial court granted a directed verdict in favor of Pine Plaza both on the complaint and on Bazzel's counterclaim. Bazzel appeals from the resulting judgment. We affirm.
We note at the outset that the standard for granting a directed verdict is the same as that for granting a summary judgment. If there is even a scintilla of evidence to support the position of the opposing party, a directed verdict is improper. Rule 50 (e),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deaton, Inc. v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Houston v. McClureSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Ex Parte BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Reynolds v. McEwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Barry v. HerringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Danford v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Bowdoin Square, LLC v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Baker v. Eufaula Concrete Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Norris v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Cone Builders, Inc. v. KulesusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.