Succession of Dyer
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Justice.
Plaintiff, as widow of the deceased claimed, under the provisions of Act No. 160 of 1920, the undivided one-half of the community of acquets and gains belonging to him, alleging that there were no descendants or ascendants, and that he had died intestate. The defendant minor, through her tutor ad hoc, answered, averring that she is the duly adopted daughter of the deceased and, as such, entitled to his undivided one-half interest in the community of acquets and gains which existed between the deceased and his wife.
Counsel for plaintiff contended that the notarial act of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Succession of PizzatiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Brand v. MornhinvegSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- In Re OwenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Hardy v. MobleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moore v. RoemerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Succession of PizzilloSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Twiggs v. JOURNEYMEN BARBERS, ETC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
- Roksvaag v. ReilySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- Godchaux Sugars, Inc. v. OckmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.