Legal Opinion
Armacost v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 15, 1918PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County. (McLane, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.
The appellant was convicted under an indictment which charged that he, Erba Armacost,
“unlawfully and wilfully did obtain certain credits, goods and wares of the value of one hundred and thirty-two dollars current money of the United States from a certain Vincent T. Capíes, with intent then and there him the said Vincent T. Candes to defraud by means of a certain check' drawn upon the First National Bank of Hampstead (a body corporate), not indebted to the said Erba Armacost, the said Erba Armacost not providing for the payment and acceptance of the said check, the same not being paid upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jules v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- Schaumloeffel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
- State v. BlizzardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- Carnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Coblentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Seidman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Ayre v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- State v. LassotovitchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.