Legal Opinion

Wertz v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 17, 2002No. 54A01-0108-CR-321PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Defendant, Kurt Werts (Wertz), appeals his conviction for dealing in cocaine, a Class A felony, Ind.Code § 35-48-4-1.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Wertz raises three (8) issues on appeal, which we restate as follows:

1. Whether the trial court erred in denying his Motion for Modification of Bond.

2. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support his conviction for dealing in cocaine.

3. Whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence of prior bad acts.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On April 14, 2000, Jarrod Gruenhols (Gruerholz), a confidential…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tillman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hardiman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hobbs v. LINDSEY, SHERIFF, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Monegan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Harvey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sneed v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Chad J. Ley v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API