Legal Opinion

State v. Urdahl

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 14, 2005No. 2004AP3014-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

¶ 1. The issue on this appeal is whether Ted Urdahl's federal and state constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. After the dismissal of the charges initially filed against Urdahl, he was convicted in this action of possession of five grams or less of cocaine with intent to deliver within 1000 feet of a park in violation of Wis. Stat. §§ 961.41(lm)(cm)l and 961.49(2)(a) (2003-04), 1 and fleeing an officer in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.04(3). He appeals the circuit court's order denying his motion for dismissal of the charges in this action on the ground that the delay in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. Janice Wallace, United States of America v. Elmore PennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  2. State v. LockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  3. State v. Luis A. RamirezWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Love, DaVonte v. Radtke, DylonDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2023
  5. Ronald Lema Kupsky v. Sue De HaanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API