Legal Opinion
Petosa v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 17, 1976PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated October 22, 1975, which is in favor of plaintiffs, upon a jury verdict, after a trial limited to the issue of liability only. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. In the early morning hours of January 14, 1971, some time around 4:30 or 4:45 a.m., defendant Primo Lane, a foreman employed by the Department of Sanitation of the City of New York, was engaged in patrolling the roadway in and about the Staten Island Expressway.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Tedla v. EllmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Miller v. HineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Alongi v. BeuterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Pelkey v. KentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wilmot v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- McCummings v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Aranzullo v. SeidellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- McDonald v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1998
- Surjnarine v. BrathwaiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.