Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Bi-State Development Agency

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1996No. 68906PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GERALD M. SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Kloster Construction Company (Kloster) and the City of St. Louis (City) appeal from a Labor and Industrial Relations Commission award holding each of them liable to claimant Gerald Watkins (Watkins) for workers’ compensation benefits. The Commission affirmed a decision by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) finding that Watkins was an employee of both Kloster and the City. The ALJ also found that Watkins was not an employee of Bi-State Development Agency (Bi-State). We affirm. 1

Viewed in the light most favorable to the Commission’s award, the facts are as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woodburn v. May Distributing Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Ceradsky v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Howard v. WinebrennerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  4. Stufflebean v. Crete Carrier Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Gaston v. J.H. Ware Trucking Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Systematic Business Services, Inc. v. BrattenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Clark v. FAG Bearings Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Leach v. Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Wilmeth v. TMI, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API