Equitable Life Insurance v. Bowman
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.
This an action for rent in the sum of $300. Defendants filed an answer in the nature of a bill of interpleader asking that the plaintiff and one A. D. McHenry interplead for the fund in controversy which defendants admitted to be owing, to one or the other. The court made an order requiring plaintiff and McHenry to interplead for the fund whereupon the defendants paid said sum in controversy into court. Thereafter McHenry filed his answer and interplea, to which plaintiff filed a reply. The court rendered a decree in favor of the interpleader, McHenry., Plaintiff has appealed.
The case was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Biddle v. HussmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
- Ala. Gold Life Insurance v. OliverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- John McMenamy Investment & Real Estate Co. v. DawleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Steed v. HinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Vantage Mining Co. v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hahn v. VerretNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Tinnon v. TanksleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Lindley's Trust No. 1 v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Clarkson Lindley Trust v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940
- Lindley Trust v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940