State v. Northard
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
■The cases before us raise questions about the retroactivity of reduced presumptive sentences under the guidelines for offenses carrying a mandatory minimum sentence. 1 In 1983, the' legislature applied “good time” reductions to mandatory minimum sentences. The Sentencing Guidelines Commission in turn reduced the presumptive duration for mandatory minimum sentences effective November 1,1983. The common issue in these four eases is whether the reduced presumptive sentences are retroactive for those inmates sentenced before November 1, 1983.
I
This retroactivity…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. BrotenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Seifert v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.