Wright v. Anderson
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentPoleey, J.
('dissenting).
I am not able to agree with the disposition made of this case toy the majority of the court. It appears to be the theory of the majority that when a junior incumbrancer forecloses his mortgage and purchases the mortgaged property at the foreclosure sale and then purchases the notes secured by the prior mortgage, and takes on assignment of such mortgage, that the mortgaged property becomes a “primary fund” for the payment of both incumbrances and that the owner of the prior mortgage having acquired title to the property through a foreclosure of the junior mortgage, the prior debt…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sletten v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Bank of Ipswich v. WilsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928