Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph Anthony Davis

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 26, 1972No. 72-2438PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the denial of appellant’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The issue here presented is precisely the same as the one presented and decided adversely to appellant in United States v. Davis, 447 F.2d 1376 (CA9 1971), cert. denied 405 U.S. 933, 92 S.Ct. 939, 30 L.Ed.2d 809 (1972).

This circuit is firmly committed to the rule that where an issue has been decided on direct appeal from a conviction, it cannot be relitigated again on a § 2255 motion. The decision on the direct appeal is the law of the case. Odom v. United States, 455 F.2d 159, 160 (CA9 1972). Appellant argues that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berlin Acey Odom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. Peter Arthur FoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  3. United States of America, and v. Joseph Anthony DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Raymond Pandelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Anthony LoschiavoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Philip TraversCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Richard Emerson Bonnette, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API