Legal Opinion

Albert v. Goldman-Link, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 1, 1995No. 94-1484PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARIENTE, Judge.

This is an appeal by Mona Albert (client) from a final order granting an attorney’s charging lien to Goldman-Link, P.A., the law firm which represented her in an action for alimony and child support arrearages. The client challenges both the propriety of the trial court granting a charging lien and the amount of the charging lien. We affirm the trial court’s order imposing a charging lien, but reverse the application of a contingency risk multiplier.

We have no record of the attorney’s fees hearing. Without a transcript of the hearing where evidence was taken on whether a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. QuanstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. Rosenberg v. LevinSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  5. SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA v. PoletzSupreme Court of Florida · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flynn v. Sarasota County Public Hospital BoardDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
  2. Trontz v. WinigDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API