Legal Opinion

State v. Matson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1931No. 22643. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The defendants were, by information, charged with unlawfully opening up, conducting, and maintaining a place for the sale of intoxicating liquor, to which they pleaded not guilty. At the conclusion of the state’s evidence, the defendants Dick Talo and Fred Elo moved for a directed verdict, which motion was overruled. The defendants rested without testifying or offering any evidence, and a verdict of guilty was returned as to each of them. Motion for new trial being made and overruled, a separate judgment and sentence was entered as to each defendant, from which they appeal.

The facts are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PistonaWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. ColotisWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State v. BillyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Spokane City Club v. Union Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TranchellWashington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API