Legal Opinion

Pappageorge v. Rosa

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 10, 1954No. 250, Docket 22964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this landowner’s action for damages to his buildings from an adjoining sewer excavation, plaintiff’s basic contention of an absolute duty to avoid a cave-in on the part of the defendant contractor must fail. Such duty appertains only to the land in its natural state; where, as here, it is encumbered with buildings, the basis of liability must be negligence, as the trial judge correctly charged. Canfield Rubber Co. v. Leary & Co., 99 Conn. 40, 121 A. 283; Carrig v. Andrews, 127, Conn. 403, 17 A.2d 520, 132 A.L.R. 993; 4 Restatement, Torts § 817 (1939). The other assigned errors are without…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carrig v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. Canfield Rubber Co. v. LearySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pappageorge v. RosaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API