Legal Opinion

Osage Oil & Transportation Inc. v. City of Fayetteville

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 4, 1976No. 76-72PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The appellant, Osage Oil and Transportation, Inc., contends by this appeal that Section 17B-4(c) of Ordinance No. 18931 of the City of Fayetteville is unconstitutional because it provides for summary removal of signs upon an ad hoc determination by the City’s Building Inspector that a particular sign is unlawfully maintained. In support of its contentions, appellant relies upon McLean v. Fort Smith, 185 Ark. 582, 48 S.W. 2d 228 (1932). The City of Fayetteville on the other hand relies upon our decisions in McKibbin v. Fort Smith, 35 Ark. 352 (1880) and Harvey v. DeWoody,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. County of Searcy v. StephensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, FAYETTEVILLE v. Osage Oil & Transp., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. McKibbin v. Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  4. Harvey v. DewoodySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1856
  5. McLean v. Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Quinn v. Webb Wheel ProductsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Beaumont v. AdkissonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Beaumont v. AdkissonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API