Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Richard Summerall v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 13, 2015No. 1D14-1256Published

1ConcurrenceWolf, J.

I concur in the result in this case. The victim’s testimony concerning the mother’s statements of what appellant told her was predominantly being introduced for the truth of the matter asserted: “he was going to put four bullets in her head.” This testimony constituted inadmissible hearsay. See Kennedy v. State, 385 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (holding that a statement of murder victim that the defendant intended to kill the victim in the future constituted inadmissible hearsay).

The statements made shortly before the assault took place, however, are relevant and material to demonstrate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Christopher v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Kennedy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Oscar E. Castanon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API