Legal Opinion

Finch, Pruyn & Co. v. Kearns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 12, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Spain, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Dawson, J.), entered July 17, 2000 in Essex County, which, inter alia, dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Newcomb Central School District approving expenditures for capital improvements.

This proceeding arises out of a proposal by the Board of Education of respondent Newcomb Central School District to undertake a $3.34 million capital improvement project, including over $1 million for the construction of a heated swimming pool. In 1999, the voters of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MATTER OF SCHULZ v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Between the Bread II, Ltd. v. UrbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. UrbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sabino v. DiNapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Finch, Pruyn & Co v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Dill v. Lake Pleasant Central School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2002
  4. Finnan v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Pocantico Home & Land Co. v. Union Free School District of TarrytownsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API