Legal Opinion

Connell v. Call-A-Cab, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 24, 2006No. 1031731Published

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Justice.1

■ This is an appeal from the Houston Circuit Court, which entered a summary judgment for defendant Call-A-Cab, Inc., d/b/a AAA. Cab Company (“AAA”), reasoning that “an employer is not liable for the *72sexual misconduct of its employee even in a common carrier case involving a taxi.” Because the trial court's judgment overlooks Alabama’s long-standing tradition of holding common carriers liable for assaults on their passengers, we reverse and remand.

I.Case History

The facts, as alleged by Kristi Connell, the plaintiff below, are as follows: In December 2003, Connell telephoned…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte RizkSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Potter v. First Real Estate Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Callens v. Jefferson County Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Birmingham Railway & Electric Co. v. BairdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API