Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Utter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 1, 1980No. 569PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WICKERSHAM, Judge:

Following a non-jury trial, appellant, Robert Utter, was found guilty of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. Post-verdict motions were denied and appellant was sentenced. 1 On appeal, Utter contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of sentence.

The pertinent facts are as follows. On March 27, 1978, at approximately 10:00 p. m., two Philadelphia police officers stopped a van driven by Utter for speeding. Appellant was unable to produce a driver’s license or vehicle registration card but claimed that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Interest of DelSignoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Waldron AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. CaesarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. LiddickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. DunlapSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Com. v. Horlick, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Com. v. Horlick, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Cox, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API