Legal Opinion

In re ULROP-HUFF Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided January 9, 1925No. 9056Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

The facts, which are not disputed, show that the claimant, Whitehouse, Davis & Co., Inc., sold and delivered 250 hags of nuts, valued at $2,000, to one lilrop, to be paid for by Mm on September 6th, 30 days after sale. Thereafter Ulrop sold to the Ulrop-IIuff Company, Ine., bankrupt, which assumed the payment of the nuts. Later the bankrupt suggested securing the vendor in lieu of meeting its payment. It was - then agreed that the title, should vest in the vendor until the nuts were fully paid for, and none used or sold until released by the latter. Possession of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stimson v. . WrigleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Blake v. . CorbettNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. In re FriendCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API