Legal Opinion
R. H. Macy & Co. v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 1955PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.
Judgment is here sought declaring plaintiff R. H. Macy & Co. to he an “ insured ’ ’ under the liability policy of defendant General Accident Company entitling plaintiff to defense and coverage in an action brought against it by one Curry. The controversy is essentially between two insurance companies, tha.t is, between plaintiff’s own liability insurance carrier, Zurich General Accident and Liability Insurance Company, and the defendant.
The facts briefly are as follows: Television sets were being-unloaded at Macy’s warehouse from a truck owned by S & K Trucking. When the accident occurred the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Wagman v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Melcher v. . Ocean Accident Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Greenwich Bank v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Baumann v. BaumannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Surety Corporation v. L. E. Wells, Sr. v. R. Hopfe, and Ella Hopfe, and L. E. Wells, Jr., a MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1964
- D'Aquilla Bros. Contracting Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- Eastern Chemicals, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- In re the Arbitration Between Marcus & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.