Legal Opinion

Busik v. Levine

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 6, 1973No. A-92; A-93Published

1Opinion of the Court

63 N.J. 351 (1973)

307 A.2d 571

JOHN R. BUSIK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

JOSEPH M. LEVINE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. A-92 GILMA GIRALDO (BUSIK), PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

JOSEPH M. LEVINE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. DONALD F. FOLEY AND LILLIAN FOLEY, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

UNITED ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS, INC. AND PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS CO., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. A-93

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 20, 1973.

Decided July 6, 1973.

Mr. Richard J. Carroll argued the cause for appellant Levine (Mr. Louis J. Pantages, of counsel; Messrs. Gleeson, Hansen and Pantages,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  4. Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  5. Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API