Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Metropolitan Nat. Bank

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 19, 1932No. 1457PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

The trial of this action was begun on April 19, 1932, and the taking of testimony was concluded on May 5, 1932. The matter was originally on the calendar as a jury ease, and before trial was referred to an auditor by an order of this court wherein the auditor was “to make a preliminary investigation as to the facts, to hear the witnesses, report on the issues and matters hereinafter specified, and make and file a report in the office of the Clerk of this Court with a view to simplifying the issues for the jury, but not finally to determine any of the issues in the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Cunningham v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Smith v. AyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Bischoff v. . Yorkville BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Union Stock Yards Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. Waggoner Nat. BankDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1934
  2. State Bank & Trust Co. v. Commercial Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API