Legal Opinion

Shain v. Searcy

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1857PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Collin. Tried below before the Hon. Nat. M. Burford. The facts are stated in the Opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hemphill, Ch. J.

Suit to recover from the stakeholder money staked as a het upon a horse race. Petition alleges that the judges could not decide which of the two horses had won the race, and proclaimed that each party should draw his het or run the race over, and that the petitioner in the exercise of his discretion, did not choose to run the race again, but demanded of the appellee, Searcy, (the stakeholder,) the money placed by the appellant in his hands as a wager, which he refused to deliver. General demurrer to the petition was sustained and the plaintiff appealed.

In this judgment of the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pipkin v. Kaufman & RungeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Delaware Ins. Co. v. HuttoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Delaware Ins. Co. v. HuttoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Sweeney v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API