Richardson v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Candler, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
There is no merit in the general grounds of the motion for new trial. The State’s evidence, as it appears from our statement of the facts, abundantly proved the crime of murder as charged in the indictment; and this is true because a confession of guilt, when freely and voluntarily made, is direct evidence of the highest character (Eberhart v. State, 47 Ga. 598; Pressley v. State, 201 Ga. 267, 39 S. E. 2d, 478); and when corroborated by proof of the corpus delicti, as in this case, is sufficient to authorize a conviction. Code, § 38-420;…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eberhart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
- Pressley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Emmett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gilder v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Ramsey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Davis v. THE STATESupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.