Legal Opinion

City of Buffalo v. International Railway Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtLytle, J.

The facts herein involved are not in dispute to any material extent.

*498The defendant, International Railway Company, is a domestic street railway company and the proper defendant in this action, operating upon various streets in the city of Buffalo.

The consent, grant and franchise for said operation were made about December 24, 1895, approved by the mayor of the city of Buffalo, January 6, 1896, and accepted by the defendant, or its predecessors, January 23, 1896, in the following manner: “ The said Company hereby accepts all the terms and conditions of said grant or franchise, hereby expressly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whiteside v. North American Accident InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Conway v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Mayor of New York v. Harlem Bridge, Morrisania & Fordham Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. City of New York v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. Brick & Terra Cotta Co. v. HullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API