Legal Opinion
Empire Paving & Construction Co. v. Prather's Administrator
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 15, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from the St. Louis' City Circuit Court. — Hon. Leroy B. Yalliant, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.
On November 1, 1890, the plaintiff on the one part, and the defendant’s intestate and one Yon Phul on the other part, entered into a written contract, the material portions whereof which bear on the present inquiry are as follows:
“This agreement, made between the Empire Paving and Construction Company, hereinafter called the party of the first part, and Yon Phul and Prather, hereinafter called the party of the second part.
“Whereas, the said party of- the first part is the owner of two patents for an improvement in artificial stone block pavement, and whereas, the said party of the second part…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Oliver v. Rumford Chemical WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Pope Manufacturing Co. v. Gormully & Jeffery Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- City of St. Louisex rel. Sullivan v. ClemensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Leahy v. Dugdale's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Estate of Huffman v. HuffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- Elms Realty Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- Gordon v. Jefferson CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Van Wagner v. SlaneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
- Hall v. ChitwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904