Jack Powers and Rita Powers, D/B/A Irwin Sales Company v. Coffeyville Livestock Sales Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Jack and Rita Powers, plaintiffs in the case below, appeal from judgment entered against them in favor of defendant Coffey-ville Livestock Sales Co., Inc. (Coffeyville). The only issue on appeal is whether Coffey-ville, a Kansas corporation in the business of auctioning…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Service Iron Foundry, Inc. v. M. A. Bell Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
- Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Itoh v. Kimi Sales, Ltd.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Bruce v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Regan Purchase & Sales Corp. v. PrimaveraCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- La Societe Nationale Pour La Recherche, La Production, Le Transport, La Transformation Et La Commercialisation Des Hydrocarbures v. Shaheen Natural Resources Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Travis v. Washington Horse Breeders Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Alabama Powersport Auction, LLC v. WieseSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- Travis v. WA. HORSE BREEDERS ASS'N, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
- El Jordan v. Solymar, S. De R.L.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.