Legal Opinion

Joncas v. Krueger

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1973No. 209PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The sole question is whether sec. 180.40 (6), Stats., 1 applies to shareholders of a foreign corporation licensed to do business in Wisconsin. By virtue of this section, shareholders of every corporation other than a railroad corporation are personally responsible, with limitations, for all unpaid debts owing by the corporation to employees for services rendered but not exceeding six months’ service. This section was positioned in the statute in ch. 180 and sec. 180.02 (1) provides by way of definition the following:

“180.02 Definitions. As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Thomas v. MatthiessenSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. German-American Coffee Co. v. . DiehlNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Pinney v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. State v. DuffyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Dane County v. McManusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brunswick Corp. v. E.A. Doyle Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1991
  2. Opinion No. Oag 23-88, (1988), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1988
  3. Opinion No. Oag 36-86, (1986), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API